I've come to you today to preach the gospel of hate. Hate gets a very bad rap, doesn't it? It's about the one thing everyone can agree on, that hate is bad. Bad, bad, bad, so very bad indeed. Not like love, noooo. Love good! Hate, BAD!!!
Is hate a bad thing? So much of today's hatred is fueled by ignorance and pre-conception and clinging to old ways and beliefs, that it certainly seems unarguable that hate is bad. Racism, homophobia, sexism. Ignorant hate is terrible.
But not because it is hate. Because it is ignorant. Hate itself is a powerful motivator for change and it always has been, and presumably always will be.
We created medicines because we hate being sick.
We created vehicles because we hate walking everywhere.
We created society because we hate being alone.
Love? Love doesn't change a thing. Love accepts everything, just the way it is. If love had its way we would still be protoplasm floating without meaning in the primoridal soup. It's because of hate that change exists.
I don't know any of you, but I hate you all. And it's wonderful.
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Monday, June 2, 2014
Maleficent trends
The movie Maleficent which opened recently seems to be an interesting confluence of a few recent unfortunate trends in modern pop culture storytelling. I'm thinking about it right now, so I will record these thoughts. The two trends in particular are the "dark re-imagining" of fairy tales, and the perceived need to explain villains away. Let's explore, shall we?
The DARK RE-IMAGINING of a CLASSIC FAIRY TALE
Alice In Wonderland got it. Little Red Riding Hood got it. Snow White got it TWICE in one year. Now it's Sleeping Beauty's turn. The DARK, GRITTY "re-imagining" of a fairy tale Disney property. This one is so ironic it is practically a cure for anemia. Because if you spend like five minutes doing the knowledge, you find out that fairy tales were FUCKED UP. Dark? That's not even the half of it. Read some of the original works sometime. Does the wolf eat Red Riding Hood in the end? Yes! Does Sleeping Beauty get raped? Yes! These were the prevailing myths of their era, and like any era's myths, reflective of the time they came from. And that time was FUCKED the FUCK UP to the FUCKED DEGREE.
And then, in the last century, Disney cleaned up all these gruesome, grisly, quite frankly disturbing stories into something that was "suitable for children" -- so out went all the violence, and the rape, and the murders, and the fucked up unhappily ever after endings, and the entire story of Bluebeard (because just TRY fitting THAT into the Disney formula) and in came the bright colors, and the catchy sing-songs, and the cute comic relief characters. And to entire generations who couldn't be bothered doing the five minutes of knowledge mentioned above, those ARE what fairy tales are. Not gruesome time capsules of a far less civilized era. Cutesy, and magical, and princess-erific.
Now, in this century, with the culture's obsession with DARK and GRITTY, those cutesy colorful sanitized sing-along stories have no place. They seem strangely irrelevant. So instead we now have the wholly modern "dark re-imagining" that is entirely ignorant of how very dark the originals' imagining could be in the first place. Maleficent falls squarely into this trend. Go back and read Charles Perrault's Sleeping Beauty. Then watch Angelina Jolie ham it up with enhanced cheekbones against a green screen. I'm just saying.
The SAD BACKSTORY of a CLASSIC VILLAIN
Ah, villains. They don't make them like they used to. Time was, you could just be deliciously evil and chew up scenery for the sake of being deliciously evil and chewing up scenery. Now every villain has to have a thoroughly dumb origin story that EXPLAINS why they're so deliciously evil and prone to chewing scenery. Darth Vader is sad because he misses his mommy. Hannibal Lecter is sad because Nazis ate his little sister. Boba Fett is sad because his dad got his head cut off. Dracula is sad because his wife is dead. The Wicked Witch Of The West is sad because... I don't remember, actually. It's been a long time since I read that book. My point is, everyone is sad, sad, sad. So sad! Maleficent is just the latest victim of the "needs an explanation for the evulz" trend.
Now, I'm not against villains with well-rounded, fully-sketched out characters and a clear motivation for their villainy. Magneto, for example, is a villain who cannot survive without his ties to the Holocaust, and specifically being sad because of said Holocaust. Frankenstein's Monster was always infused with tragic motivations for his monstrous deeds. But Darth Vader, man? Hannibal Lecter? Come on! Can't evil just be evil for the sake of being evil? Especially in stories that aren't meant to be realistic psychological studies of human nature but are intended as pure escapism? Just let them chew the damn scenery already! And now we have poor Maleficent, seemingly the last of the classic melodramatic evil mold, given a backstory that explains why she too is sad, so very sad indeed.
On second thought, it's just as well Bluebeard has been utterly forgotten. Because otherwise he'd probably be next in line with a dark re-imagining that explains why he, like his beard, is so blue.
The DARK RE-IMAGINING of a CLASSIC FAIRY TALE
Alice In Wonderland got it. Little Red Riding Hood got it. Snow White got it TWICE in one year. Now it's Sleeping Beauty's turn. The DARK, GRITTY "re-imagining" of a fairy tale Disney property. This one is so ironic it is practically a cure for anemia. Because if you spend like five minutes doing the knowledge, you find out that fairy tales were FUCKED UP. Dark? That's not even the half of it. Read some of the original works sometime. Does the wolf eat Red Riding Hood in the end? Yes! Does Sleeping Beauty get raped? Yes! These were the prevailing myths of their era, and like any era's myths, reflective of the time they came from. And that time was FUCKED the FUCK UP to the FUCKED DEGREE.
And then, in the last century, Disney cleaned up all these gruesome, grisly, quite frankly disturbing stories into something that was "suitable for children" -- so out went all the violence, and the rape, and the murders, and the fucked up unhappily ever after endings, and the entire story of Bluebeard (because just TRY fitting THAT into the Disney formula) and in came the bright colors, and the catchy sing-songs, and the cute comic relief characters. And to entire generations who couldn't be bothered doing the five minutes of knowledge mentioned above, those ARE what fairy tales are. Not gruesome time capsules of a far less civilized era. Cutesy, and magical, and princess-erific.
Now, in this century, with the culture's obsession with DARK and GRITTY, those cutesy colorful sanitized sing-along stories have no place. They seem strangely irrelevant. So instead we now have the wholly modern "dark re-imagining" that is entirely ignorant of how very dark the originals' imagining could be in the first place. Maleficent falls squarely into this trend. Go back and read Charles Perrault's Sleeping Beauty. Then watch Angelina Jolie ham it up with enhanced cheekbones against a green screen. I'm just saying.
The SAD BACKSTORY of a CLASSIC VILLAIN
Ah, villains. They don't make them like they used to. Time was, you could just be deliciously evil and chew up scenery for the sake of being deliciously evil and chewing up scenery. Now every villain has to have a thoroughly dumb origin story that EXPLAINS why they're so deliciously evil and prone to chewing scenery. Darth Vader is sad because he misses his mommy. Hannibal Lecter is sad because Nazis ate his little sister. Boba Fett is sad because his dad got his head cut off. Dracula is sad because his wife is dead. The Wicked Witch Of The West is sad because... I don't remember, actually. It's been a long time since I read that book. My point is, everyone is sad, sad, sad. So sad! Maleficent is just the latest victim of the "needs an explanation for the evulz" trend.
Now, I'm not against villains with well-rounded, fully-sketched out characters and a clear motivation for their villainy. Magneto, for example, is a villain who cannot survive without his ties to the Holocaust, and specifically being sad because of said Holocaust. Frankenstein's Monster was always infused with tragic motivations for his monstrous deeds. But Darth Vader, man? Hannibal Lecter? Come on! Can't evil just be evil for the sake of being evil? Especially in stories that aren't meant to be realistic psychological studies of human nature but are intended as pure escapism? Just let them chew the damn scenery already! And now we have poor Maleficent, seemingly the last of the classic melodramatic evil mold, given a backstory that explains why she too is sad, so very sad indeed.
On second thought, it's just as well Bluebeard has been utterly forgotten. Because otherwise he'd probably be next in line with a dark re-imagining that explains why he, like his beard, is so blue.
Friday, May 30, 2014
Cogito Ergo Some?
I've boiled down what I know to "something seems to be experiencing something." The first something is me, or my mind, or my soul, or my ego, or my consciousness, or whatever. The second something is everything else that I seem to be experiencing: all of it.
Except that I am not actually a THING, a static noun, I am a verb, a motion, a wave; and all that goes double-plus for what I seem to be experiencing. It is a multitude of things that are not things, breaking off, coming together, interacting in infinitely predictable yet also infinitely novel ways.
Another problem with the idea of boiling it down to two somethings (or two some-not-a-things) is that there is actually only one thing. And, of course, that it is not a thing at all per se.
Plus: the very use of the verb "to be" is always suspect, hard as it is to avoid. (See?)
So... I don't actually know ANYTHING, do I?
Except that I am not actually a THING, a static noun, I am a verb, a motion, a wave; and all that goes double-plus for what I seem to be experiencing. It is a multitude of things that are not things, breaking off, coming together, interacting in infinitely predictable yet also infinitely novel ways.
Another problem with the idea of boiling it down to two somethings (or two some-not-a-things) is that there is actually only one thing. And, of course, that it is not a thing at all per se.
Plus: the very use of the verb "to be" is always suspect, hard as it is to avoid. (See?)
So... I don't actually know ANYTHING, do I?
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Two Americas
America was founded by religious nuts looking to get away from the religious nuts in their original countries. This double whammy of religious nut-ism has led to there being functionally two different Americas today: the one that was founded by religious nuts; and the one that was founded as an escape from the influence of religious nuts. Today these two Americas are often called "conservative" and "liberal."
Monday, April 28, 2014
Love, and the Axe
Kids, I'm going to impart some wisdom to you that no one ever imparted to me and I had to figure it out for myself. Maybe I can pass it on to someone who can be saved the trouble.
Life is finite. Anyone, ANYONE, that is not willing or not able to love you for who you are, must be cut out of your life or have their impact on your life minimized to the greatest possible extent. Anyone. Your parents. Your children. Your wife or husband. The mother or father of your children. Your oldest childhood friends. Anyone. At. All. Must be cut out of your life if they cannot love you for who you are.
I'm not saying to be mean about it. I'm not saying to be melodramatic. You don't have to hate them, or be angry with them. You don't have to say horrible hurtful things to them. You don't even necessarily need to let them know they've been cut out. Just, cut them out. If it hurts them, that is not on you.
Life is short, and then it is over. Surround yourself with people that love you for who you are. More importantly, love yourself for who you are. Life is short, too short for anything else.
Life is finite. Anyone, ANYONE, that is not willing or not able to love you for who you are, must be cut out of your life or have their impact on your life minimized to the greatest possible extent. Anyone. Your parents. Your children. Your wife or husband. The mother or father of your children. Your oldest childhood friends. Anyone. At. All. Must be cut out of your life if they cannot love you for who you are.
I'm not saying to be mean about it. I'm not saying to be melodramatic. You don't have to hate them, or be angry with them. You don't have to say horrible hurtful things to them. You don't even necessarily need to let them know they've been cut out. Just, cut them out. If it hurts them, that is not on you.
Life is short, and then it is over. Surround yourself with people that love you for who you are. More importantly, love yourself for who you are. Life is short, too short for anything else.
Saturday, March 22, 2014
Astrology Made Sensible
It's real simple. Everything is cyclical, and 99% of free will is an illusion. The same patterns keep playing out, like a fractal on a treadmill. By and large, people born at THIS position in the cycle are more likely to have THESE traits and go through THESE events, as opposed to people born at OTHER positions in the cycle. Now, there's also a lot of random noise, and the 1% of free will that does exist is by nature unpredictable, so even the best and most accurate astrology can never be anything more than a series of guideposts. In ancient times, when things were less complicated and individual will had less power, the patterns were clearer, clear enough to mark off by the stars they saw in the sky. But like the story of the finger pointing at the moon, they confused the stars as INDICATORS of what position the cycle was in with the stars as the DETERMINATOR of what position the cycle was in. And most people are dumb and uneducated, and 99% of free will is an illusion. Which brings us to today. And so ends today's lesson.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
personal sovereignty in scarequotes civilization
When you hand over your personal sovereignty to anyone, ANYONE, the risk is always there that your trust will be abused and the power they collect as millions all hand over their own personal sovereignties in turn will be utilized in things you personally would want no part with. It's virtually impossible to hold onto ALL of your personal sovereignty, and I wholeheartedly recommend rendering unto Caesar and all that, but no one should ever be surprised when human beings -- untrustworthy and awful -- turn around and do untrustworthy and awful things. At any level of what we might call scarequotes civilization.
Sunday, December 29, 2013
Who was Jesus? Glad you asked! (an overly long response to a somewhat flippant question on Facebook)
Jesus was a revolutionary and visionary from thousands of years back who, despite growing up in a backwards time and among a more or less backwards people, looked out at the mass of injustice and hypocrisy in the world and how cruel people were to one another and assembled a different view of how things could be and how people should behave towards one another. The people who are on top today, he said, will be on the bottom when the reckoning comes. And those who have lost shall be comforted. He suggested letting go of an attachment to physical possessions, especially when in comparison to the worth of any human life. He strongly renounced self-righteous hypocrites.
No one at the time knew what to make of him. Some thought he must be some sort of god himself because he was so clearly ahead of his time. Others, threatened that someone so simple and poor and humble could yet be so vastly superior to them, had him executed in one of the most grisly and sadistic manners "humanity" has ever devised. Immediately afterwards, or soon enough as dammit, the same sort of status quo wealth-and-power assholes who had him killed latched on to his name and his movement, had him declared a god for reals, and have ever since done all sorts of terrible things in his name, becoming exactly the kind of self-righteous hypocrites the dude spent his life denouncing.
Meanwhile, there are those have still managed to pick up the greatest portion of his message, undiminished across centuries, and are still working steadily to make his dream of heaven on Earth a reality. Or so they say. In any case, he prophesied that one day the dead would rise again, and while the loopy superstitious cats who wear his torture device on their necks believe this will be some supernatural divine shit, I am pretty sure it will be good old fashioned human know-how that eventually makes this miracle a reality. Those with ears, let them hear.
No one at the time knew what to make of him. Some thought he must be some sort of god himself because he was so clearly ahead of his time. Others, threatened that someone so simple and poor and humble could yet be so vastly superior to them, had him executed in one of the most grisly and sadistic manners "humanity" has ever devised. Immediately afterwards, or soon enough as dammit, the same sort of status quo wealth-and-power assholes who had him killed latched on to his name and his movement, had him declared a god for reals, and have ever since done all sorts of terrible things in his name, becoming exactly the kind of self-righteous hypocrites the dude spent his life denouncing.
Meanwhile, there are those have still managed to pick up the greatest portion of his message, undiminished across centuries, and are still working steadily to make his dream of heaven on Earth a reality. Or so they say. In any case, he prophesied that one day the dead would rise again, and while the loopy superstitious cats who wear his torture device on their necks believe this will be some supernatural divine shit, I am pretty sure it will be good old fashioned human know-how that eventually makes this miracle a reality. Those with ears, let them hear.
A quick look back at Jay-Z's post-Black Album discography:
Kingdom Come? More like Kingdom Dumb.
American Gangster? More like American Wankster.
Blueprint 3? More like Doo-print 3.
Watch The Throne? More like Watch The Porcelain Throne.
Magna Carta Holy Grail? More like Massive Shart, Holy Fail.
American Gangster? More like American Wankster.
Blueprint 3? More like Doo-print 3.
Watch The Throne? More like Watch The Porcelain Throne.
Magna Carta Holy Grail? More like Massive Shart, Holy Fail.
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Duck Anus and the Seven Woes of Matthew 23
So Phil Robertson from the show Duck Dynasty popped off his mouth and said a lot of ignorant illiterate inbred hillbilly shit in an interview and suddenly the world, which heretofore was inexplicably entranced by his ignorant illiterate inbred hillbilly antics and had elevated him to a television star and face on t-shirts, became shocked and dismayed by the revelation that an ignorant illiterate inbred hillbilly may hold views that are a bunch of ignorant illiterate inbred hillbilly shit, and the ignorant illiterate inbred hillbilly was suspended indefinitely from his ignorant illiterate inbred hillbilly TV show.
That should have been the end of the story. Another sign of the shifting of the times. But then, the people who are most terrified of the shifting of the times, because the times are going to make them and theirs irrelevant -- ie, the conservative wingnut faction that only SEEMS like they suddenly became a force to contend with in recent years when my own memory is these assholes have been around my whole lifetime -- decided to seize on the moment as a rallying point for their culture wars. I guess to take a break from all the War On Christmas crap.
(Here's the War On Christmas in a nutshell, future historians: This is, right here and now, literally the first time in the history of this society that the voice of the Other has been able to be heard above the roar of the smug and entitled majority, and to a certain subset of said smug and entitled majority it is TERRIFYING. The idea that there are people who celebrate their own different winter holidays or indeed celebrate none at all is threatening to people who believe it is their god-given right to shove Christmas down everyone else's throat. Any attempt at getting them to respect or even acknowledge the existence of other traditions or non-believers, is perceived as an attack. The War On Christmas. Now back to our program.)
So first the governor of Louisiana comes out and immediately demonstrates that the governor of a state in this Union, right now today, has no functional understanding of how the First Amendment works. Not to be undone in idiocy, the inexplicably still-relevant Sarah Palin comes out to show that she, who was once almost the Vice President of the United States, also has no clear or cogent comprehension of the concept. And then every idiot fucking Republican tea bag motherfucker has to swallow the party line and parrot this same lame line about freedom of speech, or even better, freedom of religion. Because Phil Robertson is a Christian. So obviously whatever dumb shit this dumb ass says about the undesirability of anuses or how black people were more godly before civil rights came along is clearly motivated by his faith in Jesus.
Cue a bunch of snarky articles defining the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and how it does not insure one continued employment if said free speech should become a threat to the employer's livelihood. And then a bunch of people wondering where Sarah Palin was when Martin Bashir got fired a few weeks ago for making the completely reasonable suggestion that someone should shit in Sarah Palin's mouth. Those with longer memories chuckle and remember when Bill Maher got fired after 9/11 and how no one said boo about free speech. Cue more snarky articles reminding Republicans that the right of an employer to fire an employee in a free marketplace is actually about as Republican as it gets. Some also draw parallels between the right wing rushing to defend the right of some duck fuck to express his Christian faith and values, and the recent condemnation of Pope Francis by many of these exact same people when he freely expressed HIS Christian faith and values. Meanwhile, on the comments pages of any article about this topic, ignorant and illiterate people of all kinds line up behind the inbred hillbilly and express views that can be charitably described as on the wrong side of history.
Somewhere, an array of computers has been keeping track of all of this. Bombs are dropped by remote control death planes, precipitation seeding and nourishing more terror and violence for years to come. The spaceships are nowhere in sight. And I'm going to bed.
That should have been the end of the story. Another sign of the shifting of the times. But then, the people who are most terrified of the shifting of the times, because the times are going to make them and theirs irrelevant -- ie, the conservative wingnut faction that only SEEMS like they suddenly became a force to contend with in recent years when my own memory is these assholes have been around my whole lifetime -- decided to seize on the moment as a rallying point for their culture wars. I guess to take a break from all the War On Christmas crap.
(Here's the War On Christmas in a nutshell, future historians: This is, right here and now, literally the first time in the history of this society that the voice of the Other has been able to be heard above the roar of the smug and entitled majority, and to a certain subset of said smug and entitled majority it is TERRIFYING. The idea that there are people who celebrate their own different winter holidays or indeed celebrate none at all is threatening to people who believe it is their god-given right to shove Christmas down everyone else's throat. Any attempt at getting them to respect or even acknowledge the existence of other traditions or non-believers, is perceived as an attack. The War On Christmas. Now back to our program.)
So first the governor of Louisiana comes out and immediately demonstrates that the governor of a state in this Union, right now today, has no functional understanding of how the First Amendment works. Not to be undone in idiocy, the inexplicably still-relevant Sarah Palin comes out to show that she, who was once almost the Vice President of the United States, also has no clear or cogent comprehension of the concept. And then every idiot fucking Republican tea bag motherfucker has to swallow the party line and parrot this same lame line about freedom of speech, or even better, freedom of religion. Because Phil Robertson is a Christian. So obviously whatever dumb shit this dumb ass says about the undesirability of anuses or how black people were more godly before civil rights came along is clearly motivated by his faith in Jesus.
Cue a bunch of snarky articles defining the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and how it does not insure one continued employment if said free speech should become a threat to the employer's livelihood. And then a bunch of people wondering where Sarah Palin was when Martin Bashir got fired a few weeks ago for making the completely reasonable suggestion that someone should shit in Sarah Palin's mouth. Those with longer memories chuckle and remember when Bill Maher got fired after 9/11 and how no one said boo about free speech. Cue more snarky articles reminding Republicans that the right of an employer to fire an employee in a free marketplace is actually about as Republican as it gets. Some also draw parallels between the right wing rushing to defend the right of some duck fuck to express his Christian faith and values, and the recent condemnation of Pope Francis by many of these exact same people when he freely expressed HIS Christian faith and values. Meanwhile, on the comments pages of any article about this topic, ignorant and illiterate people of all kinds line up behind the inbred hillbilly and express views that can be charitably described as on the wrong side of history.
Somewhere, an array of computers has been keeping track of all of this. Bombs are dropped by remote control death planes, precipitation seeding and nourishing more terror and violence for years to come. The spaceships are nowhere in sight. And I'm going to bed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
